Wednesday, 23 May 2012

Walcott still lacking a ‘footballing brain’

Arsenal finally put together a convincing display of football for the first time this season, beating Bolton Wanderers 3-0 at the Emirates Stadium yesterday.

Robin van Persie scored the first two goals, and in doing so joined an elite club of players to have scored 100 or more goals for the Gunners. It is nice to see such a superb player, who has had endless bad luck with injuries over the years, confirmed as one of the club’s greats.

As well as bad luck with injuries, it is a shame that such a quality striker has been deprived of the kind of service the likes of Ian Wright and Thierry Henry benefited from in their times at the club. Although Walcott set up the century goal yesterday, it is a shame to see him as Robin’s prime source for assists.

Accused a few years ago of ‘lacking a football brain’, I’m afraid the criticism still holds a great deal of validity, and I don’t know if it’s something that is going to change. Time and time again, Theo’s pace proves a great outlet as he gets in behind defences, giving us an easy direct pass to aim for, but time and time again he then proceeds to mess things up with poor decision-making.

He is both our best weapon and our biggest weakness. No one else in the side can provide that pace and off-the-ball movement, but at the same time, he is technically one of our poorest players, which isn’t really good enough at a club of our size.

Normally a decent finisher, his worst moment yesterday was his lack of composure when put through by Alex Song. It seems when he has too much time to think, he panics; he is a quick instinct player at best, but in our style of play he will be required to pass the ball better than he does, learn to beat a few players, and to score more of a variety of goals. At the moment is he is the absolute embodiment of a one-trick pony.

Although only 18 and new to Premier League football, summer signing Alex Chamberlain already looks like he possesses a more natural gift for football. He is less one-dimensional than Walcott, whom he will inevitably be compared to. With Walcott and Benayoun both out injured now, perhaps we will see a little more of Chamberlain. We might not see it for a while, but I fancy that soon enough he’ll be a better player than Walcott. Age doesn’t always matter, as we’ve seen recently with Jack Wilshere.

As I said, although Walcott definitely has his merits, if he’s this frustrating to watch, imagine what he must be like to play with. Van Persie deserves better service as he climbs up our all-time goalscoring charts.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Mark Brus

I'm 23-years-old and currently living in Bristol, studying to be a journalist. I've been hooked on Arsenal since I was about 10, and as much as I sometimes wish I could stop, I can't give them up. Favourite player of all time would have to be Patrick Vieira for the sheer passion with which he played the game.

More Posts - Twitter

  • paul4444

    totally agree about walcott. If he wants to play as a striker he needs instinct and coolness in front of goal. He should have drawn the keeper out by moving to left or right when facing him direct with the one on one or equally been more leathal in his shot. At this stage of his career that should have been at the back of the net or it should have been made harder for the keeper. If he hasnt got ‘it’ now to match his pace he wont ever have it as there is no confidence there. He simply doesnt take his chances. We all want him to do well but that is the part of his game he needs to improve most on. If RVP was injured could he play up front on his own? no. He needs to  TH14s videos to help

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Snoppy

      May I suggest that its pretty easy to score a goal like that behind the keyboard lol! I bet you don’t even score every single one-on-one playing fifa!! Paul there is also a great irony between your post and the picture used by Mark Burs in this article did you get it?  Away in Udine, big champions league qualifier, Theo goes one one with the goalie, gives the goalie “the eyes”, slots it in the other corner. “instinct and coolness in front of goal” wouldn’t you say. Basically relax Paul, forwards will miss chances, even thierry aged 22-24 missed a hell of alot of chances hence the old “we need a fox in the box” debates. It wasn’t till Henry was 24 before he got that consistency in-front of goal.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Bigsyisback

        if Walcott ends up anywhere near as good as Henry I will walk naked from WHL to the Emirates…6 years we have been waiting for Theo to prove he is a footballer..How much longer ?

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  • Ro

    i have noticed his brain problem a long time ago, and had my doubts whether walcott would ever come good. however, i witnessed some improvements over the last 2 years so perhaps he is still on a uptrend. 

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Biggy

    Please stop slaughtering our players in the media and be happy for what they have achieved. Who else on the side could do what he did?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Splodgedog

    Mark Brus, still lacking any sort of brain.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Bigsyisback

    You want to be 39-40 and watch todays football, Theo Walcott is absolute crap he is the stereo typical modern footballer who has loads of energy and no ability, Aaron Lennon is no different so I am not being biased, managers today have no idea..wenger has played walcott and arshavin out of position for years, they should both be played more central..modern footballers are shite !

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Sid

      You’re clearly a tabloid reading sky watching mug.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Bigsyisback

        No I am a knowledgeable football supporter who is quite capable of seeing that the likes of Walcott and Lennon are nowhere near as good at delivering a ball as Waddle or even a Marwood..
        If you fail to understand the concept of a decent player and a bad one then take it out on yourself and not other people.
        for the record Jermaine Pennant is far superior at delivering a ball than Walcott..depends if you think a wide player should be able to cross a ball or just run like road runner with the same degree of footballing ability..CLOWN !

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Bigsyisback

          FOR THE RECORD LOOK UP A MAN CALLED OVERMARS ! ALSO ONE CALLED LIMPAR PROPER WINGERS, IF WALCOTT IS NOT BEING PLAYED OUT OF POSITION THEN HE IS WAY SHORT OF WHAT A WINGER SHOULD BE..ANSWER THAT IN DETAIL !

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
  • yhamisi

    I still remember Thiery Henry in his early days at Arsenal. He was dissapointing more than Walcot. Let Wenger take it and mould him as he did with Henry

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Sid

    THeo lacks a footballing brain, compared to the author of this shite, who clearly lacks a brain.

    What a moron you are Brus, your output is embarrassing and below even tabloid hack levels.

    What on earth do you follow football for? It is clearly beyond your miniscule mind.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Sid

    Brus emabbarrasses himself every time he posts an article. Each one a massive piece of steaming tabloid light shite.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Hademe Precious

    Just to remind Sid that Mak Brus is not out to hang Theo Walcot but a simple observation from his personal point of view and i also think he is correct. Walcots decision most times are terrible and one will be wondering the rate at his improvement.
      Sid is not even making any positive contribution with his indecent choice of words, i think he lack good up bringing.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Anonymous

    Twenty two years old and knows everything about football, stick to your day job Mark Brus!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous

      What does age have to do with anything? Granted we haven’t been watching football for as many years as you OAP’s (:-p)  but that doesn’t mean we can’t make good observations or good arguments.

      And how good or otherwise the writer is, has no effect on the fact that Theo isn’t very good, he makes bad decisions and doesn’t have the ability to get away with them and the only reason he has got as many chances as he has is because we spent so much money on him. As a youngster was he any better than Vela? Not really. Which one of them showed more potential and flashes of brilliance. I would argue that Vela did.

      So why has Theo got so many more chances than Vela? They both have similar records when it comes to availability (although Vela’s unavailability has been strongly linked to playing so much for mexico). The truth is that Wenger took a big gamble on walcott paying so much for him and he is trying his best not to waste that money by giving him more chances, even when he doesn’t deserve them.

      Expect to see the same with oxo and miyaichi. Regardless of which one of them shows more potential or talent (and at the moment on the one game they’ve played its been oxo), Chamberlain will get more chances throughout his arsenal career because wenger gambled more money on him.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Bigsyisback

        Chamberlain is class, my cousin is a saints fan and rates him better than Bale and Walcott…nice prospect !..agree on Walcott and Lennon is no different !

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
  • Charanjeet Singh Wadhwa

    Atleast Walcott has a brain which cannot be said for most bloggers and TV pundits nowadays…

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Bigsyisback

    Simple question would you put your last fiver on Walcott one on one running on his own from the half way line against the keeper, I personally think sitting here typing this that I could not dismiss him over running it or shinning it too wide of the keeper,
    You cannot play wide if you cannot cross a ball and you cannot be a great if you have only pace..F**k me we may as well all rush out to sign Usain Bolt then. 

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • DDinLA

    At the local pub we coined the phrase “that was a Walcott” to apply to anything that you get excited about but proved to be is a disappointment. Telling I think. Normally applied to the food.

    His high point has been the three goals against Croatia but they were pretty much identical goals, which fits the analysis.

    I also feel he is like a finicky F1 car, you get a good 20 minutes out of him at the beginning — usually — of a game then he’s finished and he needs to come in.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...