Thursday, 17 May 2012

Arsenal Holdings Plc – Interim Results/Potters Away

arsenalbadge1

Arsenal Holding’s plc’s interim accounts to 30 November 2009 were published to the PLUS Market on which our shares are traded today (Fri 26 February 2010). 

You can find the full results on the PLUS markets website here: 

http://tinyurl.com/yb2evms 

No big surprises, but there’s some good news. Profits continue to be generated by the football side of £25.8 million. A lot of this is accounted for by the transfers of Emmanuel Adebayor and Kolo Touré however. The players’ pay bill continues to explode with football operating costs up over eleven percent to £101.419 million over the same six month period last financial year. Most of this will be new contracts for current players. We can expect a further leap as the club re-negotiates with players to protect their net income from the coming increase in the top-earners’ rate of income tax in April this year. 

We’re reaching the prudent outer limit of our pay bill at the moment, following a massive expansion in recent years. We can’t afford to push it much higher unless we have a big, big increase in income. If we’re going to find money for big transfer fees and player salaries we’re going to have to either cut the number of players or the lesser players are going to have to be paid significantly less than they are at the moment. 

There’s good news on the property front with the outstanding construction loan for the old ground down to £12.9 million. 524 of the 655 flats have now been sold. By the end of this year we should have completely repaid this loan. Sales after the remaining balance of the loan has been repaid will all be profit for us – I’d guess we can look at £25-30 million coming in as a one-off injection of extra cash. I doubt we’re going to have enough to repay the £50 million floating rate note however without financially starving ourselves for a few more seasons (we refinanced after the building of the Grove with £210 million in fixed rate repayment loans and the £50 million “floating rate note”, which can be repaid at any time without early repayment penalty). 

The forthcoming UEFA financial fair play regulations to be launched this spring should provide some respite. Clubs all over the continent are scrambling to get their balance sheets in order. About time too I say. This is why Roman Abramovich has converted his loans to Chelsea into shares. Share capital (or equity as its known) is treated differently in company accounts than loans. Shareholders are the very last in the queue for repayment in the event of a company going bust. Shares don’t show as loans on the books as a shareholder can’t demand their money back on a fixed timescale as a bank or other financial institution making a conventional repayment loan can. 

The mad, bad state of football finances is graphically demonstrated by news today that Portsmouth has gone into administration ahead of a court hearing on a winding up petition for unpaid Value Added Tax, Pay As You Earn income tax and National Insurance Contributions served on the club by Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs. The club’s debts are estimated at around £70 million. Madness. Absolute madness. At least we’re a very long way from that sort of mess. Premier League rules require a nine point deduction penalty for any club entering administration. That will all but certainly doom Pompey to relegation. They were in the drop-zone before administration. 

On the field, we travel to the Potteries tomorrow to take on Stoke City in a vital League game. We’ll be without Andrey Arshavin, William Gallas and Abou Diaby due to our continuing injury plague. We need to be strong tomorrow. Three points is a real must if we’re to continue any hope of staying in the hunt for the title. Chelsea is at home to Manchester Citeh whose current form has gone off a cliff. I don’t hold out much hope there. United don’t have a League game as they face Aston Villa in the Carling Cup Final on Sunday. Having belted West Ham at home on Tuesday night however, they’re now five points ahead of us so we stay third this weekend no matter what the result tomorrow. Let’s hope that Everton can continue their excellent recent form on their visit to the Lane on Sunday afternoon. 

Keep the faith! 

vic@arsenalinsider.com

{jcomments on}
GD Star Rating
loading...
  • brdgunner

    You mention having to sell players or cut wages to increase the number of top earners or transfer funds.

    However, as the loan is paid off does this not release 20-30m a year for such a cause?

    And is this not why we are being so prudent and not spending big?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • DJ Dragonfly

    Hi Vic,

    Positive news on the financial front, however I am not in agreement with the club in regards to signing up the majority of our youngsters on new contracts.

    The club should only be offering new contracts to players who will play a major part in the future of the club.

    Although I hope the following players make the breakthrough, however can you see the likes of Sanchez Watt, Henri Lansbury, Jay Simpson, Rhys Murphy, Vito Mannone, Gavin Hoyte and Mark Randell ever becoming established first team players for Arsenal in the future?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • andrew

    Vic Crescit

    I agree we are in a good financial position compared to other EPL teams.
    Since it looks like you do have a good knowledge of our finances can you please help me understand how much wenger has available to him to spend and the most important thing is the wages for me

    You say that we can’t really afford a lot of high wage players but can we still renew contracts for players like Gallas, Merida, Silvestre and especially Fabregas (who will want a lot)
    Also if we do successfully renew these players contracts, can we still buy some good if not world class players in the next transfer window and not go over budget in wages.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Vic Crescit

    @ brdgunner/DJ Dragonfly – The loan repayments are annual for about 20 years so the increase in income comes from the bigger capacity and additional “premimum” seats and boxes. We’ve used all this money to massively increase our playing budget since the move to the Grove.

    Giving the younger players longer contracts, even those who might not make it as regular first teamers protects their value in terms of transfer fees.

    Whether we’ve got the balance right in terms of the amount we spend on salaries and signing bonuses for the more junior members of the professional squad is another issue.

    There are three big sources of income, broadcasting, the gate and other matchday revenues and comercial (sponsorship, retail, etc).

    Broadcasting is mainly negotiated centrally by the PL, FA and UEFA. We can’t influence that much. Matchday income is pretty maxed out. I certainly can’t afford to pay more. Even though my seat hasn’t increased in price for seven seasons now with the new price freeze it’s still VERY poor value at £1,825 (the top level of general admission which I have was the only one not increased in 2007/8).

    The only area we can realistically expect to significantly increase income is sponsorship. We took large amounts of cash from the Nike and Emirates deals up-front as we desperately needed cash to finish the building work. That leaves a hole in the current cash income.

    We can and I expect we will increase our income in these areas but I’d be surprised if we can up this by more than £10 million a season until the current shirt deals with Nike and Emirates in 2011 and 2014 respectively.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • andrew

    DJ Dragonfly
    I think from the players you mentioned I think Lansbury and Mannone can really make it
    I do think Mannone will have to compete with Wzscheny for the first spot but even if doesn’t make it I think we can still make some money of him in the end.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • andrew

    VIC
    so what you’re saying is that we are at the end of our wage limit but does this mean that Wenger will go overboard if he tries to renew contract of Fabregas, gallas and merida
    Does this also mean another disappointing transfer summer

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • db10

    Another source of income is the commercial sales abroad. so far we haven’t done too well in this area but with all the yanks in our club now this might be about to change.

    also I don’t know if we do this already but we could try and do what Barcelona and Madrid have done which is negotiate their own deals with foreign tv networks which are separate from the rest of the league. so sky (in england) pay for the barca and madrid matches directly to those clubs and the rest of the league misses out because thats who we want to see.

    This takes into account the demand in other countries of arsenal compared to stoke for example.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • brdgunner

    Thank you for the quick response. I am aware of the income revenues the club has and can see room for improvement commercially.

    I db10 raises a good point, although we do better abroad than a lot of people think.

    My main concern was to what extent the loan repayments are influencing the clubs spending capabilities.

    I know we extended the loan repayment structure; however, I was not aware that we had planned to repay 100m so quickly. I wondered if this was the significant change and that if we can get repayments down or finished we can then spend more without increasing income because of the cash it will relinquish the manager. I say manager as I don’t believe Arsene will benefit from his own fantastic work. Which is why I hold him in such high esteem. He has sacrificed his own glory for the cause of Arsenal football club. A legend in his own time.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Vic Crescit

    There is money to spend. Around £25 million is “earmarked” for spending on players as part of the deal with the banks on the stadium loan. I’d guess we’ll have to offer Fabregas around £2-3 million a year more to have any chance of keeping him, plus a hefty signing bonus. I don’t think Wenger will push too hard to keep Merida or Gallas. He’ll make them offers he thinks are fair and let them go if they don’t pick them up.

    This would be a pity in both cases but there’s only so much money available. My guess is that there’ll be a mini clear out of 5-6 players this summer and at least one fair-sized signing, maybe two.

    The big job will be hanging on to Fabregas, which I have a feeling will be an uphill job. I desperately hope I’m wrong on that. I’d like to hang onto him for 3-4 more seasons but it doens’t seem very likely as things stand.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • TJ14

    Spot on Vic with regard to the youngsters. If they are on say £10K a week, that is £1.5M over 3 years. If they do not make it, we would easily get more for all these players, so it is not costing the club anything. If one of these turns out to be a real gem (Fabregas), you suddenly have a very valuable asset, firstly in terms of playing and secondly if they choose to move on later, you get large sums for them.

    This policy is one that AW has perfected in his time at Arsenal. And maybe that is one of the reasons he tends not to spend really big on players as he does not like to waste money unnecessarily. He has got it right with AA and TV. Let’s hope he gets it right with a couple more in the near future.

    Arsenal fans can moan all they like about AW not spending money, but if you just take a look at the position the club is in now, it is pretty much unmatched anywhere in world football with the exception of Barca.

    Every club’s debt level is rising, ours is shrinking. And the fact it has gone down by 30% in the past year is a testament to Arsene as much as anyone else at Arsenal.

    Harry Redknapp is just a coach, Martin O’Neill is just a coach, Rafael Benitez is just a coach, Manicini is just a coach. AW is a manager, a coach, an academy builder, a stadium builder, a talent finder and lots more besides.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • brdgunner

    I have the same feeling in terms of clear up.

    I can see 4 or 5 going and being replaced with fewer more experienced players. I am more confident of keeping Fabregas. My concern is that we don’t get enough money for him. We always seam to let players go cheap as if to thank them for playing for us.

    Henry and Bent went for the same money in the same season. No way would any other club in the Premiership sell him that cheap. I wonder if the deal was done a year before.

    I think investing in the squad will keep Cesc, so if we do sell 5 and replace with more experience he will be assured of our attempt to win and stay. If we keep this squad he may go.

    Only time will tell, for now…..

    COME ON THE GUNNERS

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Vic Crescit

    @ db10 – The foreign rights to our PL, FA Cup and Carling Cup games are all sold collectively by the PL, FA and FL. Likewise rights to Champions League games. The only rights we sell directly are for the Emirates Cup and any other home friendlies.

    Colletive selling of rights for Serie A games is being re-introduced. Barca and Real Madrid are holding out against this in Spain but the pressure is growing there too.

    I’m against individual rights sales here in England & Wales. The league is already enough of a procession without futher widening the gap. I want us to win because we’ve got the best team and manager. We’ve already got shedloads more than most teams in the world, never mind the PL. How much more do we want?

    AW has made it clear he opposes pre-season tours outside Europe so that’s that unless and until he changes his mind or he’s no longer manager.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • TJ14

    I disagree on Fabregas Vic. I think he will stay. He would not be a regular in Barca’s side, he would not be idolised the way he is at Arsenal, he would not be the main attraction and he would not be the captain.

    Fabregas is a very sensible footballer and I don’t think money floats his boat. I also don’t think he would be happy winning the Champs League playing 20 mins a match. He will want to win it being the focal point, the heartbeat of the team. He would not be able to do this at Barca.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • DJ Dragonfly

    @ Vic Crescit

    I fully understand why the club is trying to tie down the majority of our youngsters onto long-term contracts, but surely the money would be better used elsewhere by off loading some of the players who are not good enough to get into the first team?

    By using the above method, not only will it help the club by decreasing its wage bill, but it will also free up funds to either improve the contracts of our better talents or increase our transfer kitty.

    In regards to increasing our kit sponsorship deal, I have heard a rumour that when our kit deal with Nike expires at the end of next season, we could make a return to Adidas. As much as I like Nike, they negotiated a great deal on their behalf, which has left us severely lagging behind the following teams:

    Barcelona – £131 Million Pounds over 5 years with Nike (£26.2 Million Pounds per season).

    Man United – £302 Million Pounds over 13 years with Nike (£23 Million Pounds per season).

    Chelski – £100 Million Pounds over 10 years with Adidas (£10 Million Pounds per season.)

    Arsenal – £56 Million Pounds over 8 years with Nike (£8 Million Pounds per season).

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • DJ Dragonfly
  • TJ14

    DJ, I think you are putting too much emphasis on the youth players here. They won’t be on large salaries. By getting rid of them, we wont be saving that much money. If we were, we would have done it by now.

    The youth system we have is self sustaining and that is the way Wenger has designed it.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • titan49

    hello everyone. I want to congratulate you on your blog. I am an avid arsenal fan, and have often found your blog to be fair and truthful. Of course all true Arsenal fans are frustrated sometimes, but you tend to see the bigger picture, and I commend you for that. Which is more than I can say for Le Grove. I for one am very upset that this blog operates the way it does. they put up a horribly biased doom and gloom article today, and have moderated me for expressing a different opinion to their own. This is a great club. One that has been managed astutely, hence why we are the team standing the most consecutive years in the English top flight. Such a club deserves true fans and blogs such as this. Optimistic on the one hand, and pragmatic on the other. Of course, we all want to win trophies, but at the same time we want to enjoy Arsenal for many years in the future. Just look at Pompey. FA Cup winners in 2008, administration in 2010. If ever there was proof that we are going about things the right way, this is it. I am extremely hurt that a blog such as Le Grove seems to be tarnishing the name of other great Arsenal blogs, and Arsenal as a whole. As bloggers I believe you have a responsibility to your readers, and hence should be encouraging the team, not slating everything about it. Again, i commend your blog for being true to its responsibilities to the club, and fans, and I can only hope that others will follow you. We are the Arsenal lads. We, the fans are the foundations of this great club, and we MUST be behind them. If the way the club is managed means my kids can watch Arsenal for many years to come, then playing champions league football every year, having the best stadium in england, playing the best football, and occasionally going on small trophy droughts (like every other club) is a small ‘sacrifice’ I am willing to make. I love the Arsenal. You do too. Let’s get behind them, support them like only we can, and get rid of those who do us injustice.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Berg10

    DJ
    If we boycott sales of the shirts and buy retro 70/71 instead they may wish to renogotiate LOL.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • superfly

    Im I right in saying this Arsenal secured the youngsters to longer contracts so the club can make money in case they dont make it. For example someone of Jay Simpson quality could be sold for 5 million. Not only a return on the invested wages (unlikely to complete full contract) but a profit as well. Also he’s spent the season on loan so his wages shouldn’t be reflected in the wage bill as the ‘loaner’ fits the bill. If they unload them now they’d lose the investment now and wouldnt get a return on the player??? :-?

    When you put it into that perspective it, its a clever scheme and the wage bill is much lower than stated…kinda contradicts the drabble that Pyles spews.
    Wenger doesn’t actually lose money on youngsters he just secures them so he can make a tidy profit of them….especially if you consider his sell on clause he usually attachs,….Thinking about it Anthony Stokes form has improved in Scotland if he’s sold im sure Wenger gets a cut of that similar to the Bentley deal.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • simon bailey

    great positive article. well reasoned and researched. i just wish more blogs were like this. as far as the points you make, you are preaching to the converted (me). spot on.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Mexican Gunner

    Arsenal cant pay the remaining of the contract with Emirates and get a better deal with another company??

    And glad to hear that the nike contract expires next year, its time to get a so much better contract.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Mexican Gunner

    But that kind of individuals negotiations only kills the league.

    I know Arsenal should see only for their interests but in the long term that will damage a lot the Premier League. Just look at Spain, only 2 super power teams fighting and the rest are far away from Madrid and Barca.

    England has the most equal league in Europe and that why its the best and most exiting to see. The same that its happening in Germany since two seasons ago and now they have a very equal and entertaining league.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Mexican Gunner

    Im very sure that Cesc will not leave this season.

    Barca paid last year more than 60mills for Ibrahimovic and 25mills for Chigrinsky. That means that they can afford 50mills for Cesc in the summer.

    I read an interview with the other guy who is fighting with Rossel for being the president of Barca and he said that the promise of buy Cesc is just to get more votes because Barca cant spend 50mills until they sell one of their stars and considering that there not on the verge to offload someone I think its very unlikely to them to buy Cesc.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • andrew

    I really dont think we will sell 5 first team players this season
    from all the players these can be sold
    GoalKeeprs
    Fabianski – Sold maybe
    Almunia – Sold maybe

    Defense
    Silvestre – Released
    Campbell – Released
    Bothelo – Released
    Traore – Sold
    Gibert – Released
    Sendros – Released

    Midfield
    Denilson – I am not sure if he will be sold
    Norvedit – Sold probably if he doesn’t make it into the first team
    Simpson – Sold or swapped for Sterling
    Merida – Released or contract extended
    Mark Randall – Sold or Released

    Attack
    Eduardo – Sold because of injuries
    Rhys Murphy – Sold maybe because of injuries

    but that’s about it and since we send most of our reserve team players on loan we actaully save a lot of money on wages

    If we do release these many players then I can see us making about 15 million and saving a huge amount on wages

    VIC what do you think ?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • football shirts

    i am really appreciating,woow very informative…..great job thank’s…!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...